| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
tonfang Altar Boy
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 48 Location: hamburg
|
Posted: Monday May 2nd, 2005 19:39 Post subject: subtick based groove machine |
|
|
request:
it's so messy getting buzz to groove by using the bpm-method. isnt there a way to code a machine that lets buzz groove by delaying every x'th step by y subticks ? oh man, that would be cool!
cause using the bpm-method means that you cant use the tick based effects.... _________________ ________
tonfang.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
icarus Choir Girl
Joined: 14 Nov 2004 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Monday May 2nd, 2005 22:26 Post subject: |
|
|
| Maby i'm understanding your question wrong, but arrent the IGroove and the Hoester Groove Box doing that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
btd Cardinal

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 765 Location: York, UK
|
Posted: Monday May 2nd, 2005 23:05 Post subject: |
|
|
I think IGroove just automates the BPM trick, and Groove Box uses an audio delay with variable length. Neither of which are the same thing.
As for the original question, without completely rewriting buzz's audio engine (always an option ) the only way I can see it being possible is with a peer machine (which would mean sequencing every groove-needing gen through it, not ideal).
Another option would be a wrapper or loader for the tick-based effects to fool them into using the "average" BPM, so that the traditional method was more usable. Again, not ideal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
majkol Priest
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Posts: 212 Location: Oxford, UK
|
Posted: Monday May 2nd, 2005 23:12 Post subject: |
|
|
| maybe u could load your generators with polacs vsti loader and automate the note delay parameter from one single peer machine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tonfang Altar Boy
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 48 Location: hamburg
|
Posted: Tuesday May 3rd, 2005 1:13 Post subject: |
|
|
ay ! thats a good idea, majkol ! but still quite a bit of work...
hotkey should implement a propper groove funktion into buzzle.... _________________ ________
tonfang.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lee_dC Priest
Joined: 15 Aug 2004 Posts: 241
|
Posted: Tuesday May 3rd, 2005 1:13 Post subject: |
|
|
| majkol wrote: | | maybe u could load your generators with polacs vsti loader and automate the note delay parameter from one single peer machine. |
or ask polac to add a "groove" feature to the loader |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tonfang Altar Boy
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 48 Location: hamburg
|
Posted: Tuesday May 3rd, 2005 12:50 Post subject: |
|
|
leedc: even better  _________________ ________
tonfang.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nool Monk

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 365 Location: ny, usa
|
Posted: Tuesday May 3rd, 2005 13:03 Post subject: |
|
|
pvst already has this
global commands
Dly Commands 08 xxyy
xx(00,01,02,1x,2x):
00: Humanize Note Delay
yy(0-7F): controls humanize amount
01: Quantize Note Delay
yy(0-0F): quantises to tick/y
02: Constant Note Delay
yy(0-FF): delays notes for y/16 tick(s)
1x: Shuffle
x(0-F): shuffle step x*2 tick(s)
yy(0-FF): shuffle amount
2x: Constant Note Delay II
xyy(0-FFF): delays notes for y/32 tick(s)
http://xlutop.com/buzz/
...
also u can assign peerlfo,peerstate to notedelays of any machine (all machines get note delays with usr's midiwrapper) or to machines that already have note delays - almost all trackers have this ..... peer machines can be assigned to track commands as well as params ... to automate slides
i think u can also assign peer machs to the master mach which would allow for subtick vairations (i believe)
also haldreamer created a few beta machines (trackers - like mixampler) that have groove funcs
hope it helps, probably missing a few more tricks _________________ http://www.noolmusic.com
ReWorked the Entire Site - Spin Laden ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
usr Pope

Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 1156 Location: nuremberg, franconia, germany, europe
|
Posted: Tuesday May 3rd, 2005 17:21 Post subject: |
|
|
heh, just tried the peer->uMw notedelay, and it actually works!
did not believe that until i tried
 _________________ .nl chefs go blok blok blok |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
icarus Choir Girl
Joined: 14 Nov 2004 Posts: 91
|
Posted: Tuesday May 3rd, 2005 18:35 Post subject: |
|
|
| Yeah I see you are totally right btd. Havent used those two machines myself. Anyway nice thing to discover that there so many options to integrate notedelays. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nool Monk

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 365 Location: ny, usa
|
Posted: Wednesday May 4th, 2005 0:26 Post subject: |
|
|
we are not confined to ticks !!! _________________ http://www.noolmusic.com
ReWorked the Entire Site - Spin Laden ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tonfang Altar Boy
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 48 Location: hamburg
|
Posted: Wednesday May 4th, 2005 11:58 Post subject: |
|
|
nool: you summed it up
but: it's a lot of work, cause you have to add the peer connections to every machine. ok.. it's not that much, but it'd be a lot easy having just one machine that does the groove. maybe notedelay could be implemented as a global parameter (affecting every instance of the loader) in polac's loader.
well... looks like it'll always be messy.... _________________ ________
tonfang.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ronny Pries Deacon
Joined: 16 Aug 2004 Posts: 127 Location: hamburg|germany
|
Posted: Wednesday May 4th, 2005 15:21 Post subject: |
|
|
tonfang, that is already implemented as global effect in the vst adapters. check nools text or the help file  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tonfang Altar Boy
Joined: 31 Aug 2004 Posts: 48 Location: hamburg
|
Posted: Thursday May 5th, 2005 14:58 Post subject: |
|
|
ay ! stupid me ..... thanks! _________________ ________
tonfang.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|