| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which buzztracker do you use DAILY ? |
| Surfsmurf's Matilde |
|
50% |
[ 25 ] |
| BTDSys Samplegrid |
|
10% |
[ 5 ] |
| Fuzzpilz Unwieldy Tracker (note in the middle) |
|
18% |
[ 9 ] |
| Fuzzpilz Unwieldy Tracker (note on the left) |
|
14% |
[ 7 ] |
| Other |
|
8% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 50 |
|
| Author |
Message |
nool Monk

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 365 Location: ny, usa
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 2:11 Post subject: Favorite Buzz Tracker |
|
|
Ok just curious about this
What is your weapon of choice as far as buzz samplers for DRUMS go (NOT instrument samples)?
NOT your favorite, or the one with the most potential
The one you find yourself using in the bmxs you made in the last month or so on a daily basis
ZZuB _________________ http://www.noolmusic.com
ReWorked the Entire Site - Spin Laden ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hamst3r Pope
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 1121 Location: Los Angeles
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
usr Pope

Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 1156 Location: nuremberg, franconia, germany, europe
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 2:17 Post subject: |
|
|
what if you -BLASPHEMY-BLASPHEMY-BLASPHEMY- DON'T USE A TRACKER DAILY???BLASPHEMY!BLASPHEMY!!! _________________ .nl chefs go blok blok blok |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nool Monk

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 365 Location: ny, usa
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 2:22 Post subject: |
|
|
| usr wrote: | | what if you -BLASPHEMY-BLASPHEMY-BLASPHEMY- DON'T USE A TRACKER DAILY???BLASPHEMY!BLASPHEMY!!! |
u are a brave soul but i couldn't create spheres the whole day long, gotta have beats, and buzz/vsti drummachines are nice, but just can't do it all with nearly as much ease...
and imo synthing drums takes alot of time and patience, so i like samples, and i think many do :p _________________ http://www.noolmusic.com
ReWorked the Entire Site - Spin Laden ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
usr Pope

Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 1156 Location: nuremberg, franconia, germany, europe
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 3:10 Post subject: |
|
|
i have recently stopped to use anything but vocoded r909 for rhythm.
and melody.
and everything else, oops.
hello mr green smiley _________________ .nl chefs go blok blok blok |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fred Bevins Shepherd

Joined: 09 Aug 2004 Posts: 78 Location: Tucson
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 3:13 Post subject: |
|
|
usr = westbam? _________________ www.fbev.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ld0d Deacon
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 106 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 8:51 Post subject: |
|
|
| nool wrote: | | and imo synthing drums takes alot of time and patience, so i like samples, and i think many do :p |
Synthing drums takes just a good editor and a little time to spare. Actually I've the editor but it's far from finished so you won't get it
Just kidding. I might release it some day. Maybe.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mirfus Monk

Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 381 Location: Leeds, UK
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 9:37 Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks to the THCs I've found myself wanting to sample trackers a fuckload more!
You can get instantly rich sounding drums from good quality samples. I shall be exploring a lot further fairly soon I think. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mute Angel
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 3361
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 9:51 Post subject: |
|
|
if we speak strictly drum wise.. i would have voted for samplegrid.
i hope version 2 comes out soon
im definitly using utrk alot lately too.. i find matilde faster because of the limited options it has. its like light tracker vs. full blown tracker _________________ http://www.lazytrap.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Xenobioz Archbishop

Joined: 08 Sep 2004 Posts: 579 Location: Sihanoukville Cambodia
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 9:53 Post subject: |
|
|
| mute wrote: | if we speak strictly drum wise.. i would have voted for samplegrid.
i hope version 2 comes out soon
im definitly using utrk alot lately too.. |
The sample grid is my favorite when it comes to playing drums on my keyboard.
Otherwise I use matilde. _________________ www.xenobioz.com
design.xenobioz.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
z_tetha Cardinal
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 921 Location: synthesis
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 11:09 Post subject: |
|
|
the pros and cons
- Utracker for sheer amount of simultaneous options
(if that is what you need).
- Matilde has the positive cuteness of being able to show more tracks at a time than utracker.
- Utracker doesnt have virtual channels
( wHY?!?!..this would be really usefull mr fuzzpilz ) Matilde i beleive does?
::: for sampled instruments , for sake of example a piano/strings(but- it also applies to crash cymbal roles snare roles and general percussive tails in samples), would be much more relaxing to track with something that doesnt -and like death doesnt discriminate - cut the previous notes tail when a new note occurs on the same track. That way there is no need to scroll to the end of the earth ...
far be it for me to bug you about this fuzzpilz- but I would gladly picket outside your house if i thought you'd budge into adding that feature. (NNA anyone ?! *coughs* - that coffee was strong)
- Samplegrid has similarities to the route drummachines, which is great and having a multiout is just fucking splendid ! just like utracker |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mirfus Monk

Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 381 Location: Leeds, UK
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 11:29 Post subject: |
|
|
...utracker it is then  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
geroyche Choir Girl

Joined: 24 Sep 2004 Posts: 87 Location: karl-marx-stadt, germany
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 12:53 Post subject: |
|
|
utracker because of multi-out and advanced commands.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fuzzpilz Chief Astrologician Of The Vatican
Joined: 21 Aug 2004 Posts: 229
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 13:34 Post subject: |
|
|
| UTrk doesn't have virtual channels because that would require a MAJOR rewrite of almost everything. Which is necessary anyway. I plan to start on it after I release it on bm.com, which is still a while away. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mirfus Monk

Joined: 27 Aug 2004 Posts: 381 Location: Leeds, UK
|
Posted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 16:15 Post subject: |
|
|
| geroyche wrote: | utracker because of multi-out and advanced commands.  |
that was indeed the selling point - woohoo!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suckow Choir Girl
Joined: 16 Oct 2004 Posts: 68 Location: Andover, MN
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mute Angel
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 3361
|
Posted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 4:26 Post subject: |
|
|
i think virtual channels in trackers is extremely overrated except where maybe midi is concerned.. but even then, if you use midi the notes will span over the available tracks added to the pattern, so it doesnt matter much in the end  _________________ http://www.lazytrap.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nool Monk

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 365 Location: ny, usa
|
Posted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 5:32 Post subject: |
|
|
well all i know is i've been using unwieldy tracker since last nov-dec 2003 and i love it, its just so intricate and fun
the note in the middle forces me to input other values i normally don't modify with say matilde...
like subdivisoin, note delay, note cut, offset, etc .... very quick and easy to get to ...
and the humanization commands, the sample pools, mutli-out, great subdiv (matilde wasn't so accurate after subdiv- ... great delays, cuts, tons of effects per tick ...
can't go wrong with it imo, thanks fuzz  _________________ http://www.noolmusic.com
ReWorked the Entire Site - Spin Laden ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wayfinder my afro is puffy what are you talking about

Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 1605 Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Posted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 6:37 Post subject: |
|
|
| mute wrote: | i think virtual channels in trackers is extremely overrated except where maybe midi is concerned.. but even then, if you use midi the notes will span over the available tracks added to the pattern, so it doesnt matter much in the end  |
On the contrary, I think that virtual channels (or NNAs, whichever term you want to use) are crucial for a great sampler, and it's one of the reasons Matilde is still my standard weapon of choice and not Utrk (note at the side version if any). Another reason is that I want a quick overview over what happens on other tracks of the pattern, and that's just not possible when the screen can only hold one and a half tracks. If there was a tracker with an interface that showed me 20 tracks (including sample number, volume and effect column) at a time, I'd probably use that a lot (even if it all was in 7 pt type ) That's one of the things I like about ModPlug Tracker, btw. All of this probably has a lot to do with how I use trackers - only for drums/fx and long stuff like vocals really, I don't think I've used instrument samples in a tracker in quite a while. The way I work when I make a conga line for example is that I give each sample its own track so I need to be able to quickly overlook the whole pattern to see where the stuff sits. My drum Matildes frequently use 15 or more tracks of different percussion and hihat elements. This is simply unnavigatable in Utrk  _________________ wayfinder |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
z_tetha Cardinal
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 921 Location: synthesis
|
Posted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 7:09 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | On the contrary, I think that virtual channels (or NNAs, whichever term you want to use) are crucial for a great sampler, |
yep. being able to see many tracks at once owns. Samplegrid deploys a healthy idea. Except, it would be handy to have a note column too in the tracks corresponding with the triggered sample
in a way, a big way, i miss being able to see all notes from all machines being triggered with the track scrolling up. ofcourse there are ways around this but creating a pattern for a note or chord then tracking in seq size 1 is a lot of work.
i'm not complaining, see it as jesting. it's about economizing visual space where possible
Last edited by z_tetha on Thursday October 21st, 2004 10:42; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mute Angel
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 3361
|
Posted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 8:04 Post subject: |
|
|
| nool wrote: |
the note in the middle forces me to input other values i normally don't modify with say matilde...
|
I use the version with note on the left,. i refuse to use a tracker that does otherwise.., i have to have the note colomn tabable. i put up with it on some synths..., but just the special ones. besides.. having the offset first is of no value to how i like to work. it is nice as a exposed param though rather than a command. _________________ http://www.lazytrap.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nool Monk

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 365 Location: ny, usa
|
Posted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 12:31 Post subject: |
|
|
| mute wrote: | | nool wrote: |
the note in the middle forces me to input other values i normally don't modify with say matilde...
|
I use the version with note on the left,. i refuse to use a tracker that does otherwise.., i have to have the note colomn tabable. i put up with it on some synths..., but just the special ones. besides.. having the offset first is of no value to how i like to work. it is nice as a exposed param though rather than a command. |
yep i used to be the same
but here you can trigger with either
offset, retrigger, or note
so 'in the middle' isn't fully accurate
(i'm talking drums here)
i use xs1 for instruments
also, with the utracker (note on left) - its tough to differientiate all those columns, gets confusing _________________ http://www.noolmusic.com
ReWorked the Entire Site - Spin Laden ! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
navidson Converted Sinner
Joined: 14 Oct 2004 Posts: 12 Location: Huddersfield, UK
|
Posted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 15:38 Post subject: |
|
|
Utracker's been around since April 2003 now or something? A long time anyway... I've been using the betas since it's first conception (hence I've stuck with the 'note in middle' version) and it's pretty much what kept me hooked on buzz, tracking drums and loops in it is an absolute joy. Matilde seems a real hassle to use in comparison.
Fuzzpilz spoils us with his contant stream of new plugins  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RDEskid Choir Girl
Joined: 03 Sep 2004 Posts: 63 Location: New England, USA
|
Posted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 17:29 Post subject: |
|
|
I'm a longtime mTrk user, but it recently started making my songs crash, so I started looking for something new and discovered uTrk, which is just incredible. I still don't understand half the features (ie humanization, note pools), but it's easy, stable, powerful, and, my favorite, it has retrigger and note delay FIELDS, as opposed to the requisite command parameters that I could never memorize in Matilde. And fuzzpilz is the man for putting out both middle and left fields to give us a choice...personally, I have enough things to confuse me without being stopped dead when I'm on a roll by an apparently missing note field (it never fails that I forget where it is if I can't tab right to it...most of my initial Jeskola Bass 3 patterns have nothing but note slides in them), but to each his own. I do miss the simplicity and familiarity of mTrk, but then, I felt the same way about Jeskola Tracker when I switched to mTrk (that one was cutting off my samples halfway through for some reason).
Samplegrid seems interesting and powerful at a glance, but I find it to be just annoying and retrograde in practice...it reminds me of my IT days, and having to build a whole new pattern with all the percussion just to change the HH sample, or add one extra snare hit...maybe I could make better use of it now that I know about Ctrl-Shift-Enter, but for now I'm happy with Utrk. _________________ http://www.myspace.com/joshbyra
"...I heard inside me such a note, the sweetest sound..." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
btd Cardinal

Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 765 Location: York, UK
|
Posted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 18:35 Post subject: |
|
|
| RDEskid wrote: | | having to build a whole new pattern with all the percussion just to change the HH sample, or add one extra snare hit |
Actually, adding columns in the sequence editor and having several patterns playing at once works just as well for samplegrid as for *trk.
I'm totally biased, but for one-shot drums I use sgrid. I don't do a lot of intricate drum programming, so having all the triggers in one place is more valuable to me than having lots of commands and options close at hand. UTrk is lovely for complex work, and technically it's a far better machine than mine, but for day-to-day use I find it a little too unwieldy. Now if Buzz had a pattern editor where the columns could be moved or hidden, it would be a whole different story... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mute Angel
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 3361
|
Posted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 23:13 Post subject: |
|
|
i dont see utrk as being superior to sgrid in any way, except maybe some bits of the code and pvst out instead of sgrid out (the out machine could actually end up a plus because more features could be added to it without depending on polac, but on the flipside its bad because 'pvst out' is kind of becomming a standard). otherwise i see it as basically the exact same. only one concentrates on triggers and volume and close sequencing tracks, the other concentrates on a traditional tracker. i find sgrid fast as hell to work with.
it also had a lot of great ideas/features before other buzz machines started doing them (groups/sample pools, first sample slot, etc). not to mention it was the first multi-out native buzz tracker. when it first came out i was in la-la land.
personally, i dont consider sgrid a tracker in the first place. it's a drum sampler..
the sample to midi key input binding is also very sexy and intuitive. while most samplers assign by key ranges and splits in a way that I've always found annoying, the way sgrid does it is quick and easy to setup (pick a sample, press a midi key, done... next sample).
i also like how the pattern data is organized.
i think comparing mtrk, utrk, and sgrid is kind of like comparing apples to oranges. they each have their pluses. _________________ http://www.lazytrap.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
usr Pope

Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 1156 Location: nuremberg, franconia, germany, europe
|
Posted: Friday October 22nd, 2004 3:47 Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | more features could be added to it without depending on polac | otoh according to our experiences so far polac will add features faster than we can think of them _________________ .nl chefs go blok blok blok |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vaud Altar Boy
Joined: 20 Aug 2004 Posts: 26
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
z_tetha Cardinal
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 921 Location: synthesis
|
Posted: Friday October 22nd, 2004 18:27 Post subject: |
|
|
but to reply to nools original thread start .
Utracker , both versions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mute Angel
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 3361
|
Posted: Friday October 22nd, 2004 18:49 Post subject: |
|
|
"A Granny Smith apple and a Sunkist navel orange were prepared by gentle desiccation in a convection oven at low temperature over several days. The dried samples were then mixed with potassium bromide and ground in a small ball-bearing mill for two minutes. One hundred milligrams of each of the resulting powders were then pressed into a circular pellet having a diameter of 1 cm and a thickness of approximately 1 mm. Infrared transmission spectra was measured at a resolution of 1 cm-1 using a Nicolet 740 FTIR spectrometer."
wtf. why can't they just peel and eat an orange, and then eat an apple like everyone else. geeks.  _________________ http://www.lazytrap.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wayfinder my afro is puffy what are you talking about

Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 1605 Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Posted: Saturday October 23rd, 2004 10:57 Post subject: |
|
|
Granny Smith are the best though! _________________ wayfinder |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hamst3r Pope
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 1121 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Saturday October 23rd, 2004 18:30 Post subject: |
|
|
Citrus rules!!
BTW: I don't like using dynamic channels / NNA's. It doesn't fit into my style. :D _________________ - Hamst3r
THA | Hamst3r.com | Myspace | Twitter | Podcast | Forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
z_tetha Cardinal
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 921 Location: synthesis
|
Posted: Sunday October 24th, 2004 11:11 Post subject: |
|
|
anyone who doesnt appreciate NNA also didn't love impulse tracker..
and, quite frankly, I think you are missing out.
Who uses Xs1 ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hamst3r Pope
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 1121 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Sunday October 24th, 2004 23:53 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't use NNA's or IT.
I used FT2 and I use XS-1 too, but rarely with overlapping releases except very minmally on strings, which I'd never do with matilde or uTrk. XS-1 all the way for that.
And I never do drums with XS-1. _________________ - Hamst3r
THA | Hamst3r.com | Myspace | Twitter | Podcast | Forum |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wayfinder my afro is puffy what are you talking about

Joined: 08 Aug 2004 Posts: 1605 Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Posted: Monday October 25th, 2004 6:37 Post subject: |
|
|
NNAs are useful for drums as well... just think about ride cymbals or really anything you play quite fast (like a snare roll) _________________ wayfinder |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
z_tetha Cardinal
Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Posts: 921 Location: synthesis
|
Posted: Monday October 25th, 2004 10:56 Post subject: |
|
|
it seems some people just dont want to see the light  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lykwydchykyn Choir Girl

Joined: 18 Aug 2004 Posts: 54 Location: Nashville, TN
|
Posted: Wednesday November 3rd, 2004 22:42 Post subject: |
|
|
I moved from matilde to utracker recently, strictly because of the sample pools feature. I mostly track acoustic drum samples (as opposed to synth drums), so the ability to randomly switch between a pool of samples is absolutely awesome. It really livens up a part, especially ridden parts like hihat or ride. I used to do this manually with matilde, now I don't need to! _________________ Home recorded CD reviews at lovelabormusic.com
My tunes and other stuff |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
relativeq Pope of the Moon
Joined: 13 Aug 2004 Posts: 60 Location: pittsburgh, pa, us
|
Posted: Wednesday November 3rd, 2004 23:58 Post subject: |
|
|
I do all my drums in Matilde. I almost decided to switch to SGrid, but I'm so used to the way I work in MTrk that it turned into a giant pain in the ass and I gave up.
UTrk is really cool, but I never use any more features than Matilde would give me. I find it a bit overwhelming, and since I only use samples for drums, generally, and all I ever use is trigger, volume, notedelay, and retrig, relearning a tracker doesn't seem productive to me. Of course, I may be missing out on some stuff, but stylistically, I don't think I'd stick with using all those newfangled contraptions anyway.
What I'd really like to see is a tracker with notedelay/notecut columns right next to the volume column like in PVST. _________________ --
http://www.chillproductions.com/relativeq/
-- |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shytan Altar Boy

Joined: 07 Dec 2004 Posts: 47 Location: Donetsk
|
Posted: Tuesday December 7th, 2004 15:09 Post subject: |
|
|
| Matilde rocks! I got a lot of respect for Fuzzpilz, but Matilde Tracker just seems more handy... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rorschach Deacon

Joined: 17 Sep 2004 Posts: 125 Location: Melbourne, Australia via London, UK
|
Posted: Tuesday December 7th, 2004 15:17 Post subject: |
|
|
Samples and tracking - Matilde
Loops - BtdStutter.
Until they stop doing what I want them to do, I don't see myself going elsewhere. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|