buzzchurch.com Forum Index The Buzz Congregation
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Favorite Buzz Tracker
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    buzzchurch.com Forum Index -> The Altar
View previous topic :: View next topic  

Which buzztracker do you use DAILY ?
Surfsmurf's Matilde
50%
 50%  [ 25 ]
BTDSys Samplegrid
10%
 10%  [ 5 ]
Fuzzpilz Unwieldy Tracker (note in the middle)
18%
 18%  [ 9 ]
Fuzzpilz Unwieldy Tracker (note on the left)
14%
 14%  [ 7 ]
Other
8%
 8%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 50

Author Message
nool
Monk


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 365
Location: ny, usa

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 2:11    Post subject: Favorite Buzz Tracker Reply with quote

Ok just curious about this
What is your weapon of choice as far as buzz samplers for DRUMS go (NOT instrument samples)?

NOT your favorite, or the one with the most potential

The one you find yourself using in the bmxs you made in the last month or so on a daily basis

ZZuB
_________________
http://www.noolmusic.com
ReWorked the Entire Site - Spin Laden !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Hamst3r
Pope


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 1121
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 2:14    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matilde! :D
_________________
- Hamst3r
THA | Hamst3r.com | Myspace | Twitter | Podcast | Forum
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
usr
Pope


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 1156
Location: nuremberg, franconia, germany, europe

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 2:17    Post subject: Reply with quote

what if you -BLASPHEMY-BLASPHEMY-BLASPHEMY- DON'T USE A TRACKER DAILY???BLASPHEMY!BLASPHEMY!!!
_________________
.nl chefs go blok blok blok
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
nool
Monk


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 365
Location: ny, usa

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 2:22    Post subject: Reply with quote

usr wrote:
what if you -BLASPHEMY-BLASPHEMY-BLASPHEMY- DON'T USE A TRACKER DAILY???BLASPHEMY!BLASPHEMY!!!


u are a brave soul Smile but i couldn't create spheres the whole day long, gotta have beats, and buzz/vsti drummachines are nice, but just can't do it all with nearly as much ease...

and imo synthing drums takes alot of time and patience, so i like samples, and i think many do :p
_________________
http://www.noolmusic.com
ReWorked the Entire Site - Spin Laden !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
usr
Pope


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 1156
Location: nuremberg, franconia, germany, europe

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 3:10    Post subject: Reply with quote

i have recently stopped to use anything but vocoded r909 for rhythm.

and melody.

and everything else, oops.



hello mr green smiley
_________________
.nl chefs go blok blok blok
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Fred Bevins
Shepherd


Joined: 09 Aug 2004
Posts: 78
Location: Tucson

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 3:13    Post subject: Reply with quote

usr = westbam?
_________________
www.fbev.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
ld0d
Deacon


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 106
Location: Helsinki, Finland

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 8:51    Post subject: Reply with quote

nool wrote:
and imo synthing drums takes alot of time and patience, so i like samples, and i think many do :p


Synthing drums takes just a good editor and a little time to spare. Actually I've the editor but it's far from finished so you won't get it Razz


Just kidding. I might release it some day. Maybe. Razz
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mirfus
Monk


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 381
Location: Leeds, UK

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 9:37    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks to the THCs I've found myself wanting to sample trackers a fuckload more!

You can get instantly rich sounding drums from good quality samples. I shall be exploring a lot further fairly soon I think.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mute
Angel


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 3361

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 9:51    Post subject: Reply with quote

if we speak strictly drum wise.. i would have voted for samplegrid.
i hope version 2 comes out soon Wink

im definitly using utrk alot lately too.. i find matilde faster because of the limited options it has. its like light tracker vs. full blown tracker
_________________
http://www.lazytrap.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Xenobioz
Archbishop


Joined: 08 Sep 2004
Posts: 579
Location: Sihanoukville Cambodia

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 9:53    Post subject: Reply with quote

mute wrote:
if we speak strictly drum wise.. i would have voted for samplegrid.
i hope version 2 comes out soon Wink

im definitly using utrk alot lately too..


The sample grid is my favorite when it comes to playing drums on my keyboard.

Otherwise I use matilde.
_________________
www.xenobioz.com
design.xenobioz.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
z_tetha
Cardinal


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 921
Location: synthesis

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 11:09    Post subject: Reply with quote

the pros and cons

- Utracker for sheer amount of simultaneous options
(if that is what you need).

- Matilde has the positive cuteness of being able to show more tracks at a time than utracker.

- Utracker doesnt have virtual channels
( wHY?!?!..this would be really usefull mr fuzzpilz ) Matilde i beleive does?

::: for sampled instruments , for sake of example a piano/strings(but- it also applies to crash cymbal roles snare roles and general percussive tails in samples), would be much more relaxing to track with something that doesnt -and like death doesnt discriminate - cut the previous notes tail when a new note occurs on the same track. That way there is no need to scroll to the end of the earth ...

far be it for me to bug you about this fuzzpilz- but I would gladly picket outside your house if i thought you'd budge into adding that feature. (NNA anyone ?! *coughs* - that coffee was strong)

- Samplegrid has similarities to the route drummachines, which is great and having a multiout is just fucking splendid ! just like utracker
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Mirfus
Monk


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 381
Location: Leeds, UK

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 11:29    Post subject: Reply with quote

...utracker it is then Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
geroyche
Choir Girl


Joined: 24 Sep 2004
Posts: 87
Location: karl-marx-stadt, germany

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 12:53    Post subject: Reply with quote

utracker because of multi-out and advanced commands. Cool
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Fuzzpilz
Chief Astrologician Of The Vatican


Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Posts: 229

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 13:34    Post subject: Reply with quote

UTrk doesn't have virtual channels because that would require a MAJOR rewrite of almost everything. Which is necessary anyway. I plan to start on it after I release it on bm.com, which is still a while away.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Mirfus
Monk


Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 381
Location: Leeds, UK

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 16:15    Post subject: Reply with quote

geroyche wrote:
utracker because of multi-out and advanced commands. Cool


that was indeed the selling point - woohoo! Dance
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Suckow
Choir Girl


Joined: 16 Oct 2004
Posts: 68
Location: Andover, MN

PostPosted: Wednesday October 20th, 2004 22:45    Post subject: Reply with quote

I know it might be pathetic, but I think I've used the arguelles pro4 the most, but lately I haven't used it because it's been sounding like crap for me.
_________________
http://www.myspace.com/oblivionspocket

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=110378

I know I suck
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
mute
Angel


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 3361

PostPosted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 4:26    Post subject: Reply with quote

i think virtual channels in trackers is extremely overrated except where maybe midi is concerned.. but even then, if you use midi the notes will span over the available tracks added to the pattern, so it doesnt matter much in the end Smile
_________________
http://www.lazytrap.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nool
Monk


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 365
Location: ny, usa

PostPosted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 5:32    Post subject: Reply with quote

well all i know is i've been using unwieldy tracker since last nov-dec 2003 and i love it, its just so intricate and fun Smile

the note in the middle forces me to input other values i normally don't modify with say matilde...

like subdivisoin, note delay, note cut, offset, etc .... very quick and easy to get to ...

and the humanization commands, the sample pools, mutli-out, great subdiv (matilde wasn't so accurate after subdiv-Cool ... great delays, cuts, tons of effects per tick ...

can't go wrong with it imo, thanks fuzz Wink
_________________
http://www.noolmusic.com
ReWorked the Entire Site - Spin Laden !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
wayfinder
my afro is puffy what are you talking about


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 1605
Location: Berlin, Germany

PostPosted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 6:37    Post subject: Reply with quote

mute wrote:
i think virtual channels in trackers is extremely overrated except where maybe midi is concerned.. but even then, if you use midi the notes will span over the available tracks added to the pattern, so it doesnt matter much in the end Smile

On the contrary, I think that virtual channels (or NNAs, whichever term you want to use) are crucial for a great sampler, and it's one of the reasons Matilde is still my standard weapon of choice and not Utrk (note at the side version if any). Another reason is that I want a quick overview over what happens on other tracks of the pattern, and that's just not possible when the screen can only hold one and a half tracks. If there was a tracker with an interface that showed me 20 tracks (including sample number, volume and effect column) at a time, I'd probably use that a lot (even if it all was in 7 pt type Wink) That's one of the things I like about ModPlug Tracker, btw. All of this probably has a lot to do with how I use trackers - only for drums/fx and long stuff like vocals really, I don't think I've used instrument samples in a tracker in quite a while. The way I work when I make a conga line for example is that I give each sample its own track so I need to be able to quickly overlook the whole pattern to see where the stuff sits. My drum Matildes frequently use 15 or more tracks of different percussion and hihat elements. This is simply unnavigatable in Utrk Sad
_________________
wayfinder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
z_tetha
Cardinal


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 921
Location: synthesis

PostPosted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 7:09    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
On the contrary, I think that virtual channels (or NNAs, whichever term you want to use) are crucial for a great sampler,


yep. being able to see many tracks at once owns. Samplegrid deploys a healthy idea. Except, it would be handy to have a note column too in the tracks corresponding with the triggered sample

in a way, a big way, i miss being able to see all notes from all machines being triggered with the track scrolling up. ofcourse there are ways around this but creating a pattern for a note or chord then tracking in seq size 1 is a lot of work.

i'm not complaining, see it as jesting. it's about economizing visual space where possible


Last edited by z_tetha on Thursday October 21st, 2004 10:42; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
mute
Angel


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 3361

PostPosted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 8:04    Post subject: Reply with quote

nool wrote:

the note in the middle forces me to input other values i normally don't modify with say matilde...


I use the version with note on the left,. i refuse to use a tracker that does otherwise.., i have to have the note colomn tabable. i put up with it on some synths..., but just the special ones. besides.. having the offset first is of no value to how i like to work. it is nice as a exposed param though rather than a command.
_________________
http://www.lazytrap.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nool
Monk


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 365
Location: ny, usa

PostPosted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 12:31    Post subject: Reply with quote

mute wrote:
nool wrote:

the note in the middle forces me to input other values i normally don't modify with say matilde...


I use the version with note on the left,. i refuse to use a tracker that does otherwise.., i have to have the note colomn tabable. i put up with it on some synths..., but just the special ones. besides.. having the offset first is of no value to how i like to work. it is nice as a exposed param though rather than a command.


yep i used to be the same

but here you can trigger with either
offset, retrigger, or note

so 'in the middle' isn't fully accurate

(i'm talking drums here)

i use xs1 for instruments

also, with the utracker (note on left) - its tough to differientiate all those columns, gets confusing
_________________
http://www.noolmusic.com
ReWorked the Entire Site - Spin Laden !
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
navidson
Converted Sinner


Joined: 14 Oct 2004
Posts: 12
Location: Huddersfield, UK

PostPosted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 15:38    Post subject: Reply with quote

Utracker's been around since April 2003 now or something? A long time anyway... I've been using the betas since it's first conception (hence I've stuck with the 'note in middle' version) and it's pretty much what kept me hooked on buzz, tracking drums and loops in it is an absolute joy. Matilde seems a real hassle to use in comparison.

Fuzzpilz spoils us with his contant stream of new plugins Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RDEskid
Choir Girl


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Posts: 63
Location: New England, USA

PostPosted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 17:29    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm a longtime mTrk user, but it recently started making my songs crash, so I started looking for something new and discovered uTrk, which is just incredible. I still don't understand half the features (ie humanization, note pools), but it's easy, stable, powerful, and, my favorite, it has retrigger and note delay FIELDS, as opposed to the requisite command parameters that I could never memorize in Matilde. And fuzzpilz is the man for putting out both middle and left fields to give us a choice...personally, I have enough things to confuse me without being stopped dead when I'm on a roll by an apparently missing note field (it never fails that I forget where it is if I can't tab right to it...most of my initial Jeskola Bass 3 patterns have nothing but note slides in them), but to each his own. I do miss the simplicity and familiarity of mTrk, but then, I felt the same way about Jeskola Tracker when I switched to mTrk (that one was cutting off my samples halfway through for some reason).

Samplegrid seems interesting and powerful at a glance, but I find it to be just annoying and retrograde in practice...it reminds me of my IT days, and having to build a whole new pattern with all the percussion just to change the HH sample, or add one extra snare hit...maybe I could make better use of it now that I know about Ctrl-Shift-Enter, but for now I'm happy with Utrk.
_________________
http://www.myspace.com/joshbyra

"...I heard inside me such a note, the sweetest sound..."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
btd
Cardinal


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 765
Location: York, UK

PostPosted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 18:35    Post subject: Reply with quote

RDEskid wrote:
having to build a whole new pattern with all the percussion just to change the HH sample, or add one extra snare hit


Actually, adding columns in the sequence editor and having several patterns playing at once works just as well for samplegrid as for *trk.

I'm totally biased, but for one-shot drums I use sgrid. I don't do a lot of intricate drum programming, so having all the triggers in one place is more valuable to me than having lots of commands and options close at hand. UTrk is lovely for complex work, and technically it's a far better machine than mine, but for day-to-day use I find it a little too unwieldy. Now if Buzz had a pattern editor where the columns could be moved or hidden, it would be a whole different story...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mute
Angel


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 3361

PostPosted: Thursday October 21st, 2004 23:13    Post subject: Reply with quote

i dont see utrk as being superior to sgrid in any way, except maybe some bits of the code and pvst out instead of sgrid out (the out machine could actually end up a plus because more features could be added to it without depending on polac, but on the flipside its bad because 'pvst out' is kind of becomming a standard). otherwise i see it as basically the exact same. only one concentrates on triggers and volume and close sequencing tracks, the other concentrates on a traditional tracker. i find sgrid fast as hell to work with.

it also had a lot of great ideas/features before other buzz machines started doing them (groups/sample pools, first sample slot, etc). not to mention it was the first multi-out native buzz tracker. when it first came out i was in la-la land.

personally, i dont consider sgrid a tracker in the first place. it's a drum sampler..

the sample to midi key input binding is also very sexy and intuitive. while most samplers assign by key ranges and splits in a way that I've always found annoying, the way sgrid does it is quick and easy to setup (pick a sample, press a midi key, done... next sample).

i also like how the pattern data is organized.

i think comparing mtrk, utrk, and sgrid is kind of like comparing apples to oranges. they each have their pluses.
_________________
http://www.lazytrap.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
usr
Pope


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 1156
Location: nuremberg, franconia, germany, europe

PostPosted: Friday October 22nd, 2004 3:47    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
more features could be added to it without depending on polac
otoh according to our experiences so far polac will add features faster than we can think of them
_________________
.nl chefs go blok blok blok
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
vaud
Altar Boy


Joined: 20 Aug 2004
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Friday October 22nd, 2004 17:51    Post subject: Reply with quote

mute wrote:
i think comparing mtrk, utrk, and sgrid is kind of like comparing apples to oranges

Comparing Apples and Oranges (a Study)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
z_tetha
Cardinal


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 921
Location: synthesis

PostPosted: Friday October 22nd, 2004 18:27    Post subject: Reply with quote

but to reply to nools original thread start .
Utracker , both versions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
mute
Angel


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 3361

PostPosted: Friday October 22nd, 2004 18:49    Post subject: Reply with quote

"A Granny Smith apple and a Sunkist navel orange were prepared by gentle desiccation in a convection oven at low temperature over several days. The dried samples were then mixed with potassium bromide and ground in a small ball-bearing mill for two minutes. One hundred milligrams of each of the resulting powders were then pressed into a circular pellet having a diameter of 1 cm and a thickness of approximately 1 mm. Infrared transmission spectra was measured at a resolution of 1 cm-1 using a Nicolet 740 FTIR spectrometer."

wtf. why can't they just peel and eat an orange, and then eat an apple like everyone else. geeks. LOL
_________________
http://www.lazytrap.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wayfinder
my afro is puffy what are you talking about


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 1605
Location: Berlin, Germany

PostPosted: Saturday October 23rd, 2004 10:57    Post subject: Reply with quote

Granny Smith are the best though!
_________________
wayfinder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Hamst3r
Pope


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 1121
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Saturday October 23rd, 2004 18:30    Post subject: Reply with quote

Citrus rules!!


BTW: I don't like using dynamic channels / NNA's. It doesn't fit into my style. :D
_________________
- Hamst3r
THA | Hamst3r.com | Myspace | Twitter | Podcast | Forum
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
z_tetha
Cardinal


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 921
Location: synthesis

PostPosted: Sunday October 24th, 2004 11:11    Post subject: Reply with quote

anyone who doesnt appreciate NNA also didn't love impulse tracker..
and, quite frankly, I think you are missing out.

Who uses Xs1 ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Hamst3r
Pope


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 1121
Location: Los Angeles

PostPosted: Sunday October 24th, 2004 23:53    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't use NNA's or IT.

I used FT2 and I use XS-1 too, but rarely with overlapping releases except very minmally on strings, which I'd never do with matilde or uTrk. XS-1 all the way for that.

And I never do drums with XS-1.
_________________
- Hamst3r
THA | Hamst3r.com | Myspace | Twitter | Podcast | Forum
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
wayfinder
my afro is puffy what are you talking about


Joined: 08 Aug 2004
Posts: 1605
Location: Berlin, Germany

PostPosted: Monday October 25th, 2004 6:37    Post subject: Reply with quote

NNAs are useful for drums as well... just think about ride cymbals or really anything you play quite fast (like a snare roll)
_________________
wayfinder
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
z_tetha
Cardinal


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Posts: 921
Location: synthesis

PostPosted: Monday October 25th, 2004 10:56    Post subject: Reply with quote

it seems some people just dont want to see the light Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
lykwydchykyn
Choir Girl


Joined: 18 Aug 2004
Posts: 54
Location: Nashville, TN

PostPosted: Wednesday November 3rd, 2004 22:42    Post subject: Reply with quote

I moved from matilde to utracker recently, strictly because of the sample pools feature. I mostly track acoustic drum samples (as opposed to synth drums), so the ability to randomly switch between a pool of samples is absolutely awesome. It really livens up a part, especially ridden parts like hihat or ride. I used to do this manually with matilde, now I don't need to!
_________________
Home recorded CD reviews at lovelabormusic.com
My tunes and other stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
relativeq
Pope of the Moon


Joined: 13 Aug 2004
Posts: 60
Location: pittsburgh, pa, us

PostPosted: Wednesday November 3rd, 2004 23:58    Post subject: Reply with quote

I do all my drums in Matilde. I almost decided to switch to SGrid, but I'm so used to the way I work in MTrk that it turned into a giant pain in the ass and I gave up.

UTrk is really cool, but I never use any more features than Matilde would give me. I find it a bit overwhelming, and since I only use samples for drums, generally, and all I ever use is trigger, volume, notedelay, and retrig, relearning a tracker doesn't seem productive to me. Of course, I may be missing out on some stuff, but stylistically, I don't think I'd stick with using all those newfangled contraptions anyway.

What I'd really like to see is a tracker with notedelay/notecut columns right next to the volume column like in PVST.
_________________
--
http://www.chillproductions.com/relativeq/
--
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Shytan
Altar Boy


Joined: 07 Dec 2004
Posts: 47
Location: Donetsk

PostPosted: Tuesday December 7th, 2004 15:09    Post subject: Reply with quote

Matilde rocks! I got a lot of respect for Fuzzpilz, but Matilde Tracker just seems more handy...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
rorschach
Deacon


Joined: 17 Sep 2004
Posts: 125
Location: Melbourne, Australia via London, UK

PostPosted: Tuesday December 7th, 2004 15:17    Post subject: Reply with quote

Samples and tracking - Matilde
Loops - BtdStutter.

Until they stop doing what I want them to do, I don't see myself going elsewhere.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    buzzchurch.com Forum Index -> The Altar All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group